![]() ![]() For example: For a video comparing different gear the "TLDW" comment should contain, at a minimum, the list of gear compared, and a basic overview of how the review is conducted. Any youtube or similar video posted here must be accompanied by a paragraph description of the video itself as a comment.Referral Links must be clearly marked as such, and a non-referral link must be provided as well. A link to your blog may be provided within this text post. If you want to talk about your product, please schedule an AMA with the modteam.Īll links to "Review Blogs" should be a text post with the full review in the post. If you are submitting a question or seeking a recommendation, please be sure to include the following information: your budget, your needs, at least 1 other product to compare with the subject of your post.All posts are categorized and tagged for 2 primary purposes: so people researching a topic can find past threads and so that subscribers with particular knowledge can find threads they're able to help in.Please report posts that do not follow the submission guidelines. ![]() Editor's note: This article originally appeared at, where you can find many other nonprofit technology resources.Gear can be Effective, Lightweight, or Inexpensive but not all three. We’re grateful for the financial support our friends there provided for this article. How do open-source productivity suites compare to Office 2016-and does it make sense for your organization to choose free, community-based software rather than the commercially licensed offering from Microsoft? We compare three toolsets on philosophy, price, and features to help you decide. Microsoft Office continues to dominate the productivity software marketplace. However, open-source options such as Apache OpenOffice and the Document Foundation's LibreOffice have emerged-and many users feel they are as good or better than Microsoft Office. ![]() How do these open-source suites differ from Microsoft Office? Should your nonprofit consider one of them? To help you decide, we compared key features of the 2016 version of Microsoft's productivity suite to Apache OpenOffice 4.1 and LibreOffice 5.1.īoth open-source suites offer tools with the same names - Writer (word processing), Calc (spreadsheets), and Impress (slide presentations) - to compete with Microsoft's equivalent products - Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. The open-source options also include "Base," a database similar to Microsoft Access a tool called "Draw" that's similar to Microsoft Visio a chart-creation module called "Charts" and an equation editor called "Math." Although some desktop versions of Microsoft Office don't include the desktop-publishing application Publisher, all now offer OneNote, a note-taking and sharing tool. Neither of the open-source alternatives provides an email or calendaring tool or an analogue for OneNote.įor the purposes of this article, we'll focus on word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation tools. Open Source Versus Commercialīefore we look at specific features of the competing suites, it may be helpful to take a step back. Let's compare the philosophical differences between the three packages and how those differences might affect how you purchase and use the suites.Ĭommercially licensed software, such as Microsoft Office, is developed by a single vendor. Its sales help fund product development, testing, marketing, salaries, and shareholder dividends. In contrast, open-source software is developed collaboratively, often by volunteers, and made available for free. OPENOFFICE OR LIBREOFFICE CODEĪnyone who wishes to use, redistribute, adapt, or improve the code can do so without permission or payment of any kind. The open-source philosophy is about more than software. Nano Puff is lighter weight than either of these if it matters to you - if I was going for sheer durability I would probably go for Ferrosi. It is born out of a deep distrust of large corporations, an enthusiasm for individual innovation, and a belief that community action is effective in solving problems. Other good options with emphasis on durability to consider are made by Outdoor Research. Not surprisingly, it can attract loyal adherents who are committed to sharing information and building better software. On the other hand, some consumers are more comfortable with a for-profit model they feel rewards and incentivizes ingenuity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |